The January 1998 all hired worker wage rate averaged
$8.41 per hour, 62 cents or eight percent above the $7.79 per
hour paid last quarter, and 82 cents or eleven percent above the
January 1997 wage of $7.59 per hour. Farmers paid an
average of $8.22 per hour, 47 cents above the $7.75 paid last
quarter, and 77 cents above the $7.45 paid last year. Agricul
tural services paid workers an average of $9.20 per hour
compared with $8.29 paid last quarter and $8.05 paid last
year.
Farm operators paid their hired workers an average
wage of $7.61 per hour during the January 1998 survey week,
up 41 cents or 6 percent from a year earlier. Field workers
received an average of $6.99 per hour, up 39 cents. Livestock
workers earned $6.97 per hour compared with $6.52 a year
earlier.
During the survey week of January 11-17, 1998, mild
temperatures prevailed over most of the United States, except
for early-week bitterly cold temperatures along the Northern
Plains. New England farmers, especially dairymen, worked
extended hours to recover from the previous week's severe ice
storm. Field activities along the Pacific Coast were hampered
again this week by an onslaught of storms bringing snow, ice,
and rain. In northern California, over 4 inches of rain fell in
many locations, halting fieldwork. However, spring vegetable
crop seedbed preparation and planting continued where
weather and soils permitted. The storms tracked eastward,
bringing precipitation into the central and northern Rocky
Mountains States.
Limited precipitation fell in the Plains and Corn Belt.
High winds sapped soil moisture in some parts of the southern
Plains, but most areas still have ample moisture supplies. On
the Texas High Plains, adequate moisture from previous
rainfall and mild temperatures prompted good winter wheat
growth, and most fields provided excellent grazing. In the
Southeast, wet weather continued as storms again brought
precipitation to the region, especially in eastern Louisiana.
|
Table 1 -- Florida agricultural workers, number of workers, wage rates, and hours worked, January 11 through 17, 1998, with comparisons |
|||||||
|
Employer, Year, and survey week |
Hired by farm operators | ||||||
| Number of workers |
Hours Worked Per Week |
Wages Paid by Type of Work | |||||
| All | Expected to work | All | Field | Livestock | |||
|
150 days or more |
149 days or less |
||||||
| HIRED BY FARMERS | Thousands | Hours | Dollars Per Hour 1/ | ||||
| 1998 | |||||||
| January 11 - 17 | 51 .0 | 41 .0 | 10 .0 | 38 .3 | 8 .22 | 7 .45 | 8 .00 |
| 1997 | |||||||
| October 12 - 18 | *45 .0 | 41 .0 | *4 .0 | *39 .9 | 7 .75 | 7 .10 | *7 .65 |
| July 6 - 12 | 40 .0 | 36 .0 | 4 .0 | 41 .5 | 7 .60 | 6 .71 | 6 .60 |
| April 6 - 12 | 60 .0 | 52 .0 | 8 .0 | 41 .0 | 7 .19 | *6 .51 | 6 .30 |
| January 12 - 18 | *56 .0 | *46 .0 | *10 .0 | *35 .7 | *7 .45 | 6 .80 | 6 .80 |
| 1996 | |||||||
| October 6 - 12 | 45 .0 | 40 .0 | 5 .0 | 37 .0 | 7 .35 | 6 .31 | 6 .65 |
| July 7 - 13 | 43 .0 | 38 .0 | 5 .0 | 37 .7 | 7 .39 | 6 .45 | 7 .10 |
| April 7 - 13 | 50 .0 | 43 .0 | 7 .0 | 38 .5 | 7 .05 | 6 .12 | 7 .10 |
| January 7 - 13 | 47 .0 | 40 .0 | 7 .0 | 39 .0 | 7 .35 | 6 .80 | 6 .80 |
|
AGRICULTURAL SERVICES |
|
||||||
| 1998 | |||||||
| January 11 - 17 | 16 .0 | 30 .0 | 9 .20 | ||||
| 1997 | |||||||
| October 12-18 | 5 .7 | 27 .2 | 8 .29 | ||||
| July 6 - 12 | 4 .0 | 39 .5 | 8 .10 | ||||
| April 6 - 12 | 13 .0 | 36 .0 | 8 .44 | ||||
| January 12 - 18 | 15 .8 | 37 .0 | 8 .05 | ||||
| 1996 | |||||||
| October 6 - 12 | 7 .0 | 24 .0 | 7 .30 | ||||
| July 7 - 13 | 3 .5 | 43 .5 | 2/ | ||||
| April 7 - 13 | 10 .0 | 31 .5 | 7 .68 | ||||
| January 7 - 13 | 14 .8 | 33 .0 | 8 .35 | ||||
|
AGRICULTURAL SERVICES |
|
||||||
| 1998 | |||||||
| January 11 - 17 | 67 .0 | 8 .41 | |||||
| 1997 | |||||||
| October 12 - 18 | *50 .7 | 7 .79 | |||||
| July 6 - 12 | 44 .0 | 7 .64 | |||||
| April 6 - 12 | 73 .0 | 7 .39 | |||||
| January 12 - 18 | *71 .8 | *7 .59 | |||||
| 1996 | |||||||
| October 6 - 12 | 51 .9 | 7 .35 | |||||
| July 7 - 13 | 46 .5 | 2/ | |||||
| April 7 - 13 | 60 .0 | 7 .14 | |||||
| January 7 - 13 | 61 .8 | 7 .62 | |||||
|
1/ Benefits, such as housing and meals, are provided some workers but the values are not included in the wage rates. 2/ Insufficient data. * Revised. |
|||||||
|
Table 2 -- Number of workers hired by farmers, wage rates, and hours worked, selected States, January 11 through 17, 1998, with comparisons 1/ |
||||||
| Item | Florida |
|
Texas & Oklahoma |
Arizona & New Mexico |
Hawaii |
United States 2/ |
| Thousands | ||||||
| All hired workers | ||||||
| January 11 - 17, 1998 | 51 | 180 | 52 | 17 | 7 | 661 |
| October 12 - 18, 1997 | *45 | 220 | 66 | 20 | 8 | *1,004 |
| January 12 - 18, 1997 | *56 | 137 | 47 | 15 | 7 | *624 |
|
Expected to work 150 days or more |
||||||
| January 11 - 17, 1998 | 41 | 136 | 44 | 15 | 6 | 528 |
| October 12 - 18, 1997 | 41 | 145 | 45 | 16 | 7 | 648 |
| January 12 - 18, 1997 | *46 | 109 | 38 | 13 | 6 | *525 |
| 149 days or less | ||||||
| January 11 - 17, 1998 | 10 | 44 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 133 |
| October 12 - 18, 1997 | *4 | 75 | 21 | 4 | 1 | *356 |
| January 12 - 18, 1997 | *10 | 28 | 9 | 2 | 1 | *99 |
| Dollars per hour 3/ | ||||||
| All hired worker wage rate | ||||||
| January 11 - 17, 1998 | 8 .22 | 7 .38 | 7 .04 | 7 .34 | 10 .24 | 7 .61 |
| October 12 - 18, 1997 | 7 .75 | 7 .55 | 6 .70 | 6 .85 | 9 .98 | 7 .31 |
| January 12 - 18, 1997 | *7 .45 | 7 .10 | *6 .12 | *6 .37 | 10 .32 | *7 .20 |
|
Wages by type of worker Field & Livestock |
||||||
| January 11 - 17, 1998 | 7 .49 | 6 .85 | 6 .61 | 6 .63 | 8 .84 | 6 .98 |
| October 12 - 18, 1997 | *7 .19 | 7 .13 | 6 .41 | 6 .25 | 8 .55 | 6 .91 |
| January 12 - 18, 1997 | 6 .80 | 6 .25 | 5 .81 | *5 .85 | 8 .87 | 6 .57 |
|
Field |
||||||
| January 11 - 17, 1998 | 7 .45 | 6 .62 | 6 .59 | 6 .63 | 8 .88 | 6 .99 |
| October 12 - 18, 1997 | 7 .10 | 7 .06 | 6 .10 | 6 .17 | 8 .49 | 6 .94 |
| January 12 - 18, 1997 | 6 .80 | 6 .04 | 5 .56 | 5 .82 | 8 .85 | 6 .60 |
|
Livestock |
||||||
| January 11 - 17, 1998 | 8 .00 | 8 .36 | 6 .65 | 6 .61 | 4/ | 6 .97 |
| October 12 - 18, 1997 | *7 .65 | 7 .84 | 6 .73 | 6 .66 | 4/ | 6 .80 |
| January 12 - 18, 1997 | 6 .80 | 7 .50 | 5 .97 | 5 .90 | 4/ | 6 .52 |
| Average hours per week | ||||||
| Hours worked by all hired workers | ||||||
| January 11 - 17, 1998 | 38 .3 | 38 .9 | 38 .5 | 42 .0 | 35 .3 | 36 .6 |
| October 12- 18, 1997 | *39 .9 | 45 .6 | 38 .8 | 41 .5 | 36 .4 | 40 .9 |
| January 12 - 18, 1997 | *35 .7 | 34 .0 | 38 .5 | 42 .6 | 35 .5 | *36 .6 |
|
1/ Excludes Agricultural Service workers. 2/ United States excludes Alaska. 3/ Value of any perquisites provided are not included in wage rates. 4/ Insufficient data for this category; included in all hired wages. *Revised. |
||||||
Two samples of farm operators are selected. First, NASS
maintains a list of farms that hire farm workers. Farms on this
list are classified by size and type. Those expected to employ
large numbers of workers are selected with greater frequency
than those hiring few or no workers. A second sample
consists of segments of land scientifically selected from an
area sampling frame. Each June, highly trained interviewers
locate each selected land segment and identify every farm
operating land within the sample segment's boundaries. The
names of farms found in these area segments are matched
against the list of farms; those not found on the list are
included in the labor survey sample to represent all farms not
on the NASS list. This methodology is known as multiple
frame sampling, with an area sample used to measure the
incompleteness of the list. Additionally, a list of agricultural
service firms was sampled in California and Florida. The
survey reference week was January 11-17, 1998.
Sampling error occurs because a complete census is not
taken. The sampling error measures the variation in estimates
from the average of all possible samples. An estimate of 100
with a sampling error of 1 would mean that chances are 19 out
of 20 that the estimates from all possible samples averaged
together would be between 98 and 102; which is the survey
estimate, plus or minus two times the sampling error. The
sampling error expressed as a percent of the estimate is called
the relative sampling error. The relative sampling error for
number of hired workers at the U.S. level was 4.8 percent.
The relative sampling error for number of hired workers
generally ranged between 10 and 20 percent at the regional
level. The U.S. all hired farm worker wage rate had a relative
sampling error of 1.3 percent. The relative sampling error was
1.3 percent for the combined field and livestock worker wage
rate. Relative sampling errors for the all hired farm worker
wage rate generally ranged between 2 and 6 percent at the
regional levels. Relative sampling errors for wage rates
published by type of farm and economic class of farm ranged
between 2 and 7 percent at the regional level.
Nonsampling errors can occur in complete censuses as
well as in sample surveys. They are caused by the inability to
obtain correct information from each operation sampled,
differences in interpreting questions or definitions, and
mistakes in coding or processing the data. Special efforts are
taken at each step of the survey to minimize nonsampling
errors.