E-mail: nass-ny@nass.usda.gov
(518) 457-5570
PEST MANAGEMENT
PRACTICES
Released: November
2001
Pest Management Practices
Overview:
The pest management practices in this report
are based on data compiled from a survey conducted in February 2001. Results
refer to responses from sampled producers concerning specific practices.
The producers were asked how many acres of a specific commodity they grew
in 2000 and what pesticide management practices they used. Pests were
defined as weeds, insects, and diseases. If the respondent used a specific
practice on a crop, it was assumed the practice was used on all of the
acres of that crop. The data are published in two tables: percent of acres
receiving the specific pest management practice and percent of farms utilizing
the specific pest management practice. The complete report, including
results at the U.S. level, can be found at www.usda.gov/nass.
Highlights:
Rotating crops to control pests was the leading
pest management practice on many commodities. For example, this practice
was used on 70 and 72 percent of the corn and soybean acres, respectively.
Tillage was used on 70 percent of the wheat acreage to manage pests. Scouting
used to make decisions was used on 88 percent of the fruit acreage while
weather monitoring was used on 77 percent of the fruit acreage. Crops
were rotated on 83 percent of the vegetable acres and alternate pesticides
were used on 74 percent of the acreage.
| Practice |
Percent
of Acres Receiving Practices |
| Northeast
Region 1/ |
| Barley |
Corn |
Soybeans |
Wheat |
Alfalfa
Hay |
Other
Hay |
Fruits
&
Nuts |
Vegetables |
All
Other &
Pasture |
| |
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
| Prevention
Practices: |
| Tillage/etc.
to manage pests |
46 |
44 |
60 |
70 |
32 |
21 |
26 |
70 |
26 |
| Remove
or plow down crop residue |
16 |
36 |
5 |
5 |
20 |
12 |
* |
23 |
11 |
| Clean
implements after fieldwork |
40 |
44 |
50 |
56 |
33 |
25 |
24 |
39 |
15 |
| Water
management practices |
* |
9 |
18 |
7 |
2 |
2 |
* |
35 |
7 |
| Avoidance
Practices: |
Biotech
varieties with insect
resistance only |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjust
planting/harvesting dates |
6 |
13 |
7 |
10 |
14 |
3 |
* |
31 |
* |
| Rotate
crops to control pests |
46 |
70 |
72 |
36 |
40 |
15 |
* |
83 |
43 |
| Biotech
varieties with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| pathogen/nematode
resistance |
|
2 |
** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Alternate
planting locations |
12 |
25 |
10 |
10 |
17 |
4 |
* |
26 |
12 |
| Grow
trap crop to control insects |
|
2 |
* |
* |
* |
|
|
* |
* |
| Monitoring
Practices: |
| Scouted
for pests |
34 |
37 |
47 |
23 |
37 |
10 |
79 |
56 |
16 |
| Records
kept to track pests |
31 |
19 |
13 |
20 |
12 |
2 |
34 |
36 |
8 |
| Field
mapping of weed problems |
11 |
32 |
4 |
5 |
16 |
10 |
* |
24 |
7 |
| Soil
analysis to detect pests |
15 |
10 |
3 |
3 |
7 |
6 |
* |
28 |
6 |
| Pheromones
to monitor pests |
* |
** |
** |
* |
* |
* |
* |
41 |
* |
| Weather
monitoring |
14 |
26 |
15 |
6 |
25 |
14 |
77 |
52 |
19 |
| Suppression
Practices: |
Biotech
varieties with herbicide
resistance only |
|
4 |
60 |
|
|
|
|
* |
* |
| Scouting
used to make decisions |
29 |
14 |
12 |
20 |
12 |
3 |
88 |
50 |
8 |
| Biological
pesticides |
* |
7 |
2 |
8 |
* |
4 |
19 |
38 |
* |
| Beneficial
organisms |
|
3 |
* |
* |
* |
|
* |
3 |
* |
| Physical
barriers |
4 |
11 |
3 |
5 |
12 |
10 |
* |
53 |
19 |
| Adjust
planting methods |
* |
5 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
6 |
5 |
| Alternate
pesticides |
11 |
36 |
24 |
15 |
21 |
8 |
77 |
74 |
13 |
| Pheromones
to disrupt mating |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
* |
* |
* |
|
*
Insufficient reports to publish data. **
Less than 1 percent. 1/
CT, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT. |
| Practice |
Percent
of Farms Utilizing Practices |
| Northeast
Region 1/ |
| Barley |
Corn |
Soybeans |
Wheat |
Alfalfa
Hay |
Other
Hay |
Fruits
&
Nuts |
Vegetables |
All
Other &
Pasture |
| |
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
| Prevention
Practices: |
| Tillage/etc.
to manage pests |
24 |
30 |
39 |
46 |
25 |
36 |
19 |
56 |
37 |
| Remove
or plow down crop residue |
13 |
27 |
10 |
34 |
20 |
11 |
* |
47 |
27 |
| Clean
implements after fieldwork |
31 |
37 |
45 |
28 |
31 |
23 |
38 |
23 |
21 |
| Water
management practices |
* |
3 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
* |
18 |
10 |
| Avoidance
Practices: |
Biotech
varieties with insect
resistance only |
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjust
planting/harvesting dates |
* |
12 |
11 |
18 |
5 |
3 |
* |
5 |
* |
| Rotate
crops to control pests |
50 |
54 |
70 |
63 |
32 |
18 |
* |
73 |
40 |
Biotech
varieties with pathogen/nematode
resistance |
|
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Alternate
planting locations |
6 |
29 |
27 |
18 |
11 |
3 |
* |
41 |
17 |
| Grow
trap crop to control insects |
|
2 |
* |
* |
* |
|
|
* |
* |
| Monitoring
Practices: |
| Scouted
for pests |
26 |
33 |
43 |
32 |
21 |
9 |
67 |
48 |
30 |
| Records
kept to track pests |
18 |
10 |
21 |
10 |
8 |
3 |
13 |
5 |
18 |
| Field
mapping of weed problems |
15 |
27 |
7 |
9 |
13 |
4 |
* |
5 |
10 |
| Soil
analysis to detect pests |
8 |
11 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
* |
3 |
15 |
| Pheromones
to monitor pests |
* |
** |
** |
* |
* |
* |
* |
2 |
* |
| Weather
monitoring |
11 |
21 |
23 |
35 |
29 |
15 |
46 |
35 |
38 |
| Suppression
Practices: |
Biotech
varieties with herbicide
resistance only |
|
13 |
78 |
|
|
|
|
* |
* |
| Scouting
used to make decisions |
16 |
8 |
11 |
8 |
4 |
2 |
70 |
4 |
25 |
| Biological
pesticides |
* |
13 |
4 |
4 |
* |
2 |
18 |
22 |
2 |
| Beneficial
organisms |
|
2 |
* |
* |
* |
|
* |
15 |
* |
| Physical
barriers |
2 |
12 |
7 |
12 |
13 |
10 |
* |
64 |
39 |
| Adjust
planting methods |
* |
5 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
|
44 |
15 |
| Alternate
pesticides |
11 |
30 |
22 |
13 |
18 |
6 |
65 |
60 |
22 |
| Pheromones
to disrupt mating |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
* |
* |
* |
|
*
Insufficient reports to publish data. **
Less than 1 percent. 1/
CT, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT. |
|