|
Weekly Ag Update Issue 55-03 January 10, 2005 |
Included in this Issue |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| Station |
Mean
|
Maximum | Minimum |
01/03 01/09 |
01/01 01/09 |
Jan |
01/01 01/09 |
Normal Jan-Jan |
| Farmington | 36.3 | 51 | 19 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0 .59 |
| Gallup | 34.4 | 53 | 14 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0 .80 |
| Capulin | 29.9 | 56 | 6 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.53 | 0 .40 |
| Chama | 27.3 | 42 | 15 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.77 | 1.01 | 1 .77 |
| Johnson Ranch | 31.4 | 48 | 15 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.67 | 0.11 | 0 .67 |
| Las Vegas | 34.4 | 57 | 13 | 0.57 | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.76 | 0 .60 |
| Los Alamos | 30.1 | 46 | 15 | 1.06 | 0.06 | 0.86 | 0.06 | 0 .86 |
| Raton | 29.4 | 57 | -1 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0 .47 |
| Red River | 25.2 | 43 | -2 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.07 | 0.73 | 1 .07 |
| Santa Fe | 35.1 | 52 | 19 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.63 | 0.36 | 0 .63 |
| Clayton | 31.4 | 65 | 9 | 0.30 | 0.41 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0 .24 |
| Clovis | 42.0 | 70 | 20 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.39 | 0.63 | 0 .39 |
| Roy | 36.1 | 62 | 11 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.34 | 0.94 | 0 .34 |
| Tucumcari | 40.7 | 66 | 17 | 0.55 | 0.68 | 0.28 | 0.68 | 0 .28 |
| Grants | 34.1 | 57 | 13 | 0.48 | 0.66 | 0.49 | 0.66 | 0 .49 |
| Quemado | 30.7 | 47 | 6 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.83 | 0.24 | 0 .83 |
| Silver City | 39.1 | 61 | 19 | 1.41 | 2.21 | 1.16 | 2.21 | 1 .16 |
| Albuquerque | 39.5 | 58 | 21 | 0.53 | 0.76 | 0.44 | 0.76 | 0 .44 |
| Carrizozo | 40.7 | 65 | 20 | 0.13 | 0.72 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0 .60 |
| Socorro | 41.3 | 64 | 19 | 0.62 | 0.79 | 0.39 | 0.79 | 0 .39 |
| Gran Quivera | 36.8 | 57 | 19 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 0.82 | 0 .70 |
| Moriarty | 35.4 | 59 | 20 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.43 | 0.62 | 0 .43 |
| Ruidoso | 41.6 | 61 | 17 | 0.80 | 1.40 | 1.12 | 1.40 | 1 .12 |
| Carlsbad | 48.6 | 73 | 27 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.35 | 0.15 | 0 .35 |
| Roswell | 45.6 | 73 | 26 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.43 | 0.29 | 0 .43 |
| Tatum | 46.6 | 75 | 27 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.39 | 0.62 | 0 .39 |
| Alamogordo | 47.4 | 64 | 28 | 0.93 | 1.03 | 0.67 | 1.03 | 0 .67 |
| Animas | 45.5 | 64 | 26 | 0.59 | 1.12 | 0.68 | 1.12 | 0 .68 |
| Deming | 43.1 | 62 | 21 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.56 | 0.78 | 0 .56 |
| Las Cruces | 46.0 | 65 | 26 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.58 | 0 .46 |
| T or C | 44.6 | 62 | 26 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.46 | 0.77 | 0 .46 |
|
(T) Trace (-) No Report (*) Correction All reports based on preliminary data. Precipitation data corrected monthly from official observation forms. NWS Forecast Office Albuquerque, NM |
||||||||
Expanded milk production in 2005 is projected to lend more stability to the industry and to lower prices. However, growth in milk
production is not expected to be rapid, dairy product demand is expected to be pretty good, and commercial exports are projected
to continue to absorb most of the domestic surplus of skim solids. Milk prices are projected to lose only about half of their 2004
increase.
Slow Milk Production Growth To Continue: Milk production continues its cautious expansion, running about 1 percent above
a year earlier since it moved positive in early summer. Strength in milk prices has proven more persistent than earlier thought,
probably bringing milk cow numbers near a year earlier for the first time since early 2003. However, growth in milk per cow remains
rather anemic, as forage problems continue, improved price ratios between milk and concentrate feeds have yet to make a splash,
and bovine somatotropin (BST) remains limited.
Record farm milk prices in 2004 have bolstered milk cow numbers. Although concentrate feed prices were high for part of the year,
returns over concentrate costs have averaged about the highest ever. These returns apparently slowed the exit of farms from
dairying, having improved the ability of even the weaker operations to hold on. Some effects may last into 2005 as these farms
probably have used some of this year's windfall to get ahead on critical expenses.
The strong returns probably did not have as much impact on expansion by robust farms. Considerable incentive existed to keep
facilities as full as possible, but many of the key factors in this year's prices likely were perceived to be too temporary to alter long-
term growth plans. Even so, the infusion of cash probably will allow farms to expand somewhat sooner than otherwise.
Replacement heifer prices eased a little this autumn, but supplies probably have stayed tight. In 2004, replacement prices are
expected to average over $1,600 per head, exceeding even the record of 2002. The United States remains closed to imports of
breeding stock from Canada. The January inventory report might show a few more homegrown replacement heifers than at the
start of 2004. However, any increase is likely to be modest because the greatest economic influence on this inventory would have
been the relatively low replacement prices of 2003.
The upward drift in milk cow numbers that began early last winter appears to have peaked in early autumn. Cow numbers are
projected to slowly decline in coming months as farm exits gradually resume, expansions stay moderate, and heifer supplies
remain tight. Decreases may accelerate as 2005 progresses, but returns are expected to remain favorable enough to limit declines
in cows. Cow numbers are expected to decline less than 1 percent in 2005, very similar to this year's slippage.
Return to:
Publication List
Previous Ag Update Issues