Return to:
Publication List
Previous Ag Update Issues



 
Weekly Ag Update

Issue 55-08

February 14, 2005 

Included in this Issue

Weather Summary
Wool Production
Mohair Production


WEATHER SUMMARY

Two storms effected New Mexico during the week. Both storms produced the greatest impact over the west half of the state, with some copious precipitation amounts over portions of the west. Silver City measured nearly 2 -1/2 inches of rain, while Farmington, Chama, Los Alamos, Gran Quivira, Ruidoso, Alamogordo and Deming all measured over an inch of moisture. Temperatures for the week were around normal or slightly above normal nearly statewide.
NEW MEXICO WEATHER CONDITIONS - FEBRUARY 7 - 13, 2005
Temperature 
Precipitation 
Station 
Mean 
Maximum  Minimum  02/07
02/13 
01/01
02/13 
Normal
Feb 
01/01
02/13 
Normal
Jan-Feb 
Farmington  38.40  51  18  1.35  1.38  0.57  2.47  1 .16 
Gallup  36.80  51  18  0.86  0.86  0.74  2.28  1 .54 
Capulin  35.40  56  11  0.00  0.00  0.56  1.55  0 .96 
Chama  27.90  43  -4  1.19  0.43  1.58  5.71  3 .35 
Johnson Ranch  35.80  49  18  0.85  0.00  0.57  0.59  1 .24 
Las Vegas  37.10  58  12  0.06  0.19  0.48  2.04  1 .08 
Los Alamos  33.20  47  15  1.05  1.24  0.80  3.87  1 .66 
Raton  34.90  61  12  0.05  0.05  0.54  2.88  1 .01 
Red River  27.10  42  -1  0.90  0.60  1.22  3.34  2 .29 
Santa Fe  36.60  50  22  0.86  0.15  0.69  2.08  1 .32 
Clayton  40.30  64  20  0.02  0.45  0.31  1.83  0 .55 
Clovis  40.30  67  22  0.03  0.58  0.51  2.92  0 .90 
Roy  39.40  61  23  0.00  0.15  0.43  2.31  0 .77 
Tucumcari  44.40  67  22  0.00  0.84  0.45  2.48  0 .73 
Grants  36.60  54  12  0.49  0.55  0.51  1.61  1 .00 
Quemado  37.00  53  10  0.31  0.31  0.72  1.54  1 .55 
Silver City  39.10  53  26  2.44  0.60  1.25  3.90  2 .41 
Albuquerque  43.50  56  26  0.75  0.82  0.46  2.20  0 .90 
Carrizozo  50.00  55  45  0.81  0.00  0.57  1.93  1 .17 
Socorro  49.00  62  41  0.61  0.63  0.39  1.94  0 .78 
Gran Quivera  40.10  53  20  1.04  1.08  0.82  2.35  1 .52 
Moriarty  37.40  52  20  0.37  0.38  0.48  2.02  0 .91 
Ruidoso  40.80  55  21  1.23  2.40  1.16  4.15  2 .28 
Carlsbad  48.50  71  35  0.10  0.79  0.35  1.24  0 .70 
Roswell  45.20  68  31  0.23  0.99  0.46  1.70  0 .89 
Tatum  43.40  67  27  0.10  0.73  0.50  1.81  0 .89 
Alamogordo  46.90  59  37  1.14  2.22  0.54  3.52  1 .21 
Animas  47.60  60  34  0.82  1.24  0.51  3.78  1 .19 
Deming  46.60  61  29  1.03  1.35  0.46  2.62  1 .02 
Las Cruces  48.40  66  33  0.72  1.47  0.37  2.37  0 .83 
T or C  46.60  62  31  0.91  1.39  0.38  2.41  0 .84 
(T) Trace (-) No Report (*) Correction
All reports based on preliminary data. Precipitation data corrected monthly from official observation forms. 


WOOL PRODUCTION

NEW MEXICO: Number of sheep shorn in New Mexico during 2004 dropped 20,000 head from 2003 to 140,000 head. The weight per fleece dropped from 7.8 pounds in 2003 to 7.3 pounds in 2004. Production decreased from 1.24 million pounds to 1.02 million pounds. Average price per pound decreased by 10 cents to $1.00, which decreased total value of production by 24 percent to $1.02 million dollars in 2004.

UNITED STATES: Shorn wool production in the United States during 2004 was 37.6 million pounds, down 2 percent from 2003. Sheep and lambs shorn totaled 5.07 million head, down slightly from 2003. The average price paid for wool sold in 2004 was $0.80 per pound for a total value of $29.9 million dollars, up 6 percent from $28.1 million dollars in 2003.
Wool: Number of Sheep and Lambs Shorn, Weight per Fleece, Production, Price per Pound, and Value by State
and United States, 2003-2004
Sheep Shorn  Weight Per Fleece  Production  Price Per Pound  Value 1/
2003  2004  2003  2004  2003  2004  2003  2004  2003  2004 
------1,000 Head----  ---------Pounds----  ---1,000 Pounds--  ----------Dollars------  -----1,000 Dollars--- 
AZ  102.0  90.0  6.1  6.4  620  580  0.34  0.30  211  174 
CA  500.0  480.0  7.0  7.1  3,500  3,400  0.79  0.82  2,765  2,788 
CO  360.0  390.0  7.2  6.6  2,580  2,570  0.74  0.85  1,909  2,185 
ID  217.0  225.0  9.7  9.4  2,115  2,125  0.86  0.88  1,819  1,870 
IL  58.0  60.0  6.8  6.8  395  405  0.23  0.26  91  105 
IN  42.0  43.0  6.7  6.4  280  275  0.19  0.21  53  58 
IA  240.0  230.0  6.0  6.0  1,450  1,370  0.29  0.34  421  466 
KS  80.0  66.0  7.0  7.3  560  485  0.45  0.57  252  276 
KY  17.0  20.0  6.8  6.8  115  155  0.24  0.31  28  42 
MD  17.0  15.0  7.1  6.9  120  103  0.34  0.41  41  42 
MI  77.0  76.0  6.2  5.8  475  440  0.30  0.45  143  198 
MN  140.0  140.0  6.8  6.5  950  910  0.30  0.37  285  337 
MO  53.0  61.0  7.0  6.1  370  375  0.42  0.40  155  150 
MT  272.0  267.0  9.5  9.3  2,597  2,472  1.03  1.17  2,675  2,892 
NE  88.0  83.0  7.2  7.2  630  600  0.35  0.43  221  258 
NV  55.0  55.0  8.4  9.3  460  510  0.95  0.94  437  479 
N ENG 1/ 37.0  40.0  7.0  7.1  260  284  0.35  0.45  91  128 
NM 160.0 140.0 7.8 7.3 1,240 1,020 1.10 1.00 1,364 1,020
NY  48.0  53.0  6.7  6.7  320  356  0.27  0.21  86  75 
NC  10.0  10.0  6.5  6.4  65  64  0.42  0.38  27  24 
ND  75.0  82.0  8.7  9.1  650  745  0.60  0.75  390  559 
OH  144.0  140.0  6.4  6.5  920  903  0.23  0.34  212  307 
OK  50.0  50.0  6.3  6.2  315  310  0.40  0.50  126  155 
OR  178.0  173.0  6.8  6.3  1,210  1,090  0.58  0.65  702  709 
PA  61.0  68.0  6.7  6.5  410  440  0.27  0.27  111  119 
SD  330.0  345.0  8.0  7.6  2,625  2,610  0.76  0.72  1,995  1,879 
TN  16.0  16.0  6.6  6.2  105  99  0.67  0.63  70  62 
TX  800.0  810.0  7.0  6.9  5,600  5,600  0.90  1.02  5,040  5,712 
UT  240.0  245.0  9.3  9.2  2,230  2,250  0.80  0.83  1,784  1,868 
VA  36.0  36.0  6.1  6.3  220  226  0.33  0.40  73  90 
WA  36.0  40.0  8.1  8.2  292  326  0.63  0.80  184  261 
WV  28.0  24.0  5.7  5.6  160  134  0.28  0.43  45  58 
WI  67.0  70.0  7.2  7.1  480  500  0.25  0.30  120  150 
WY  390.0  390.0  9.4  9.3  3,650  3,640  1.10  1.17  4,015  4,259 
Oth Sts 2/ 50.0  40.0  6.6  6.8  330  270  0.56  0.65  185  176 
U.S. 5,074.0 5,073.0 7.5 7.4 38,299 37,622 0.73 0.80 28,126 29,931
1/ Production multiplied by marketing year average price. U.S. value is summation of State values. 2/ N ENG includes CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, AND VT. 3/ Other States include AL, AK, AR, DE, FL, GA, HI, LA, MS, and SC. 

MOHAIR PRODUCTION

NEW MEXICO: Goats clipped in New Mexico in 2004 remained unchanged from the prior year at 10,000 head. The 2004 average clip per goat held steady at 6 pounds per goat which left production the same as a year earlier. Price per pound dropped from $1.25 in 2003 to $1.15 in 2004. The decline in price resulted in a 12 percent decrease in the total value from $75,000 to $66,000.

UNITED STATED: Mohair production in the United States during 2004 was 1.94 million pounds. Goats and kids clipped totaled 269,500 head. Average weight per clip was 7.2 pounds. Mohair price was 1.97 per pound with a value of 3.8 million dollars.
 
Mohair: Production, Price, and Value by Selected States and 3-State total, 2003-04 1/
State  Goats Clipped  Avg. Clip Per Goat  Production  Price Per Pound  Value 
2003  2004  2003  2004  2003  2004  2003  2004  2003  2004 
----1,000 Head--  ---------Pounds------  -----1,000 Pounds--  ----------Dollars------  -----1,000 Dollars--- 
AZ  28  22  5.0  5.0  140  110  1.40  1.10  196  121 
CA 2/ ---  2.5  ---  8.0  ---  20  ---  1.70  ---  34 
NM 10 10 6.0 6.0 60 60 1.25 1.10 75 66
TX  210  210  8.0  7.7  1,680  1,620  1.70  2.10  2,856  3,402 
Otr. Sts. 2/ ---  25  ---  5.0  ---  125  ---  1.50  ---  188 
U.S. 248 269.5 7.6 7.2 1,880 1,935 1.66 1.97 3,127 3,811
1/ 2003 data are a 3-state total. 2004 data are U.S. total. 2/ Data not available prior to 2004.


         AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC SURVEY WILL MEASURE FARM FINANCIAL HEALTH

NEW MEXICO AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS PROVIDE FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT

Agricultural producers must maintain a competitive edge to operate in a global market since they produce far beyond domestic demand. In recent years, changes in the rules of trade, shifts in domestic policy and new developments in technology have altered the landscape of global agriculture and the challenges facing American farmers.

How are agricultural producers surviving when input costs such as hired labor, fertilizer, and fuel costs continue to rise? Are government program payments providing producers an adequate safety net to allow them to make investments in land and equipment required of modern farming? Which agriculture sectors show improvement or are under financial stress?

USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) will give New Mexico agricultural producers the chance to answer these and other questions by participating in the 2004 Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS). This survey is the key financial information tool that provides the leading economic indicators of state and national agriculture for producers, agribusinesses, and government. The results will show the impact of the shifting global market, farmer production decisions, and governmental policies on the agricultural economy.

During 2003, the USDA'S Farm Services Agency (FSA) in New Mexico distributed to producers $92.4 million in farm program payments including $26 million in conservation funding, and $27 million in emergency assistance payments. Data from the ARMS is used to measure the benefits of direct, counter-cyclical, and ad hoc emergency payments as producers continue to look to the marketplace for economic reward.

"Reliable, accurate descriptions of the current economic health of New Mexico farms and ranches are crucial," said Dwaine Nelson, State Director, "especially when policymakers, farm organizations, analysts, local USDA agents, news media, farm suppliers, lenders, and others make decisions that affect growers."

Producers chosen to participate in the 2004 Agricultural Resource Management Survey will be mailed a questionnaire or visited by an interviewer to complete the report at the farm or ranch operator's convenience. Results will be published in a series of USDA reports on the current farm financial situation.

Farm Production Expenditures, the first report with results from the survey, will be released in July 2005. For a copy of the finished report or to obtain other agricultural statistics, visit the National Agricultural Statistics Service website at www.usda.gov/nass/.
 

Return to:
Publication List
Previous Ag Update Issues