|
Weekly Ag Update Issue 55-18 April 25, 2005 |
Included in this Issue |
| CROP PROGRESS PERCENTAGES WITH COMPARISONS | |||||
| CROP PROGRESS | This Week | Last Week | Last Year | 5-Year Average | |
| CHILE | Planted | 84 | 77 | 90 | 88 |
| CORN | Planted | 26 | 12 | 31 | 29 |
| COTTON | Planted | 38 | 28 | 37 | 32 |
| WHEAT (ALL) | Grazed | 26 | 13 | N/A | N/A |
|
|
|||||
| Very Poor | Poor | Fair | Good | Excellent | |
| Alfalfa | -- | -- | 31 | 55 | 14 |
| Chile | -- | 2 | 40 | 50 | 8 |
| Lettuce | -- | -- | 23 | 39 | 38 |
| Onions | -- | -- | 16 | 59 | 25 |
| Wheat (All) | -- | -- | 22 | 66 | 12 |
| Cattle | -- | 2 | 23 | 70 | 5 |
| Sheep | 3 | 5 | 27 | 60 | 5 |
| Range/Pasture | 2 | 10 | 29 | 56 | 3 |
|
|
||||
|
Very Short |
Short | Adequate | Surplus | |
| Northwest | 3 | 20 | 75 | 2 |
| Northeast | 13 | 28 | 58 | 1 |
| Southwest | 6 | 24 | 70 | -- |
| Southeast | 1 | 19 | 75 | 5 |
| State Current | 7 | 23 | 67 | 3 |
| State-Last Week | 2 | 30 | 65 | 3 |
| State-Last Year | 2 | 42 | 52 | 4 |
| State-5-Yr Avg. | 28 | 38 | 33 | 1 |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| Station |
Mean
|
Maximum | Minimum |
04/18 04/24 |
04/01 04/24 |
Apr |
01/01 04/24 |
Normal Jan-Apr |
| Farmington | 53.8 | 78 | 27 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.51 | 4.18 | 2 .48 |
| Gallup | 49.3 | 77 | 20 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 6.01 | 3 .23 |
| Capulin | 49.7 | 72 | 30 | 0.25 | 2.15 | 1.01 | 5.56 | 2 .86 |
| Chama | 43.2 | 67 | 17 | 0.42 | 0.73 | 1.27 | 10.89 | 6 .61 |
| Johnson Ranch | 49.0 | 77 | 23 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.49 | 4.09 | 2 .47 |
| Las Vegas | 50.4 | 70 | 32 | 0.17 | 0.94 | 0.83 | 4.69 | 2 .54 |
| Los Alamos | 48.9 | 65 | 33 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 7.38 | 3 .88 |
| Raton | 47.9 | 72 | 27 | 0.31 | 1.10 | 1.06 | 6.61 | 2 .90 |
| Red River | 41.1 | 61 | 19 | 0.49 | 1.29 | 1.68 | 9.05 | 5 .75 |
| Santa Fe | 52.5 | 72 | 36 | 0.56 | 0.96 | 0.81 | 6.62 | 2 .87 |
| Clayton | 54.2 | 79 | 33 | 0.18 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 4.90 | 2 .04 |
| Clovis | 59.0 | 83 | 41 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.81 | 3.92 | 2 .30 |
| Roy | 53.1 | 75 | 32 | 0.25 | 1.01 | 0.82 | 5.14 | 2 .14 |
| Tucumcari | 58.9 | 82 | 40 | 0.11 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 4.52 | 2 .00 |
| Grants | 50.7 | 74 | 24 | 0.17 | 0.27 | 0.45 | 3.85 | 1 .95 |
| Quemado | 47.2 | 75 | 19 | 0.45 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 3.86 | 2 .95 |
| Silver City | 54.3 | 75 | 33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.53 | 8.06 | 3 .90 |
| Albuquerque | 58.7 | 77 | 41 | 0.37 | 1.14 | 0.52 | 5.42 | 1 .96 |
| Carrizozo | 57.6 | 74 | 34 | 0.07 | 0.88 | 0.36 | 5.42 | 2 .10 |
| Socorro | 58.8 | 81 | 35 | 0.08 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 3.77 | 1 .41 |
| Gran Quivera | 54.2 | 71 | 33 | 0.20 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 5.82 | 2 .88 |
| Moriarty | 48.5 | 72 | 28 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.66 | 5.25 | 2 .10 |
| Ruidoso | 50.0 | 67 | 34 | 0.30 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 6.61 | 4 .24 |
| Carlsbad | 65.5 | 89 | 44 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.49 | 3.44 | 1 .49 |
| Roswell | 60.6 | 86 | 39 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.65 | 2.73 | 1 .99 |
| Tatum | 58.2 | 85 | 36 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.64 | 2.69 | 2 .05 |
| Alamogordo | 64.9 | 80 | 47 | 0.63 | 1.11 | 0.26 | 5.72 | 1 .93 |
| Animas | 63.9 | 84 | 43 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.20 | 4.78 | 1 .86 |
| Deming | 63.0 | 85 | 40 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.18 | 3.78 | 1 .54 |
| Las Cruces | 64.2 | 84 | 45 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.21 | 3.63 | 1 .26 |
| T or C | 63.5 | 82 | 44 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 3.14 | 1 .40 |
|
(T) Trace (-) No Report (*) Correction All reports based on preliminary data. Precipitation data corrected monthly from official observation forms. |
||||||||
Beef Supplies Remain Tight: The market this past winter was complicated by poor weather conditions holding down feedlot gains and the court injunction. First-quarter production was down 2 percent from the low levels of a year ago and down almost 9 percent from first quarter 2003. Steer and heifer slaughter declined over 3 percent, while cow slaughter was down nearly 6 percent. Commercial slaughter weights were record high last fall, but are going to average about 3 pounds under the 2002 record of 758 pounds dressed weight during the first quarter.
In both years, cow slaughter comprised 16.3 to 16.5 percent of commercial slaughter. Commercial dressed
weights are up about 14 pounds from the low levels last year.
The female retention phase of the cattle cycle is holding down cow slaughter and feeder cattle supplies remain
very tight with last years calf crop down nearly 1 percent from a year earlier and the lowest since 1951. With
reduced cow slaughter and 3 percent more beef heifers expected to calve this year, the calf crop is expected to
begin a cyclical rise, but the rise begins from decades- low levels which will continue to hold down beef supplies
through at least 2007. The additional beef that enters the U.S. market when the border opens will be assimilated
within a year of the border's fully opening. The United States will still be at the initial stages of herd expansion and
Canadian reaction to expansion may be very guarded, at least for the first few years as producers rebuild their
financial base and adjust to new trading rules. Both countries will have more feedlot and slaughter capacity than
cattle, and cyclical firm adjustments due to low cattle inventories will continue as both sectors compete strongly
for the available inventory.
Beef production in the second quarter is expected to rise from the low winter quarter levels as feeding conditions
improve and fed cattle marketings rise. In addition, slaughter weights are expected to average well above those
of a year ago, and likely above the 2002 record of 746 pounds. As the border reopens in the second half of the
year, production is expected to rise 6 to 7 percent above the low year earlier levels. Most of the year-to-year
increases due to the border's opening are expected to be worked through the market by mid 2006. USDA will
release its 2006 forecasts in May.
Retail Prices Rise With Tight Supplies: Retail prices for Choice beef are again rising. Prices averaged about
$408 at the beginning of the year and rose to $4.13 in February. As the supply tightness continues, retail prices
are likely to rise seasonally through spring. In 2001 and 2002 retail beef prices were about 25 percent above pork
prices; in 2003, with the ban on Canadian beef, the ratio moved up to 40 percent. In 2004 and so far in 2005 the
ratio has risen to 45 percent. The high beef price and uncertain supply situation is increasingly making both pork
and broiler meat relatively attractive. Beef demand and prices remain strong, but relatively lower prices for
competing meats will force adjustments as end users turn to competing meats at more consistent supply levels
as well as lower relative prices.
| Cattle on Feed: Number on Feed, Placements, Marketings, and Other Disappearance, 1,000+ Capacity Feedlots 1/ | ||||||||||||
| Number on Feed | Placed | Marketed | Other Disappearance2/ | |||||||||
| 4/1/04 | 3/1/05 | 4/1/05 | ---------------------------------------------DURING---------------------------------------------------- | |||||||||
| 3/04 | 2/05 | 3/05 | 3/04 | 2/05 | 3/05 | 3/04 | 2/05 | 3/05 | ||||
| ----------------------------------------------------------------1,000 Head---------------------------------------------------------------- | ||||||||||||
| AZ | 293 | 322 | 323 | 33 | 23 | 27 | 32 | 24 | 24 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| CA | 495 | 515 | 500 | 70 | 49 | 65 | 71 | 54 | 70 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| CO | 970 | 1,040 | 1,020 | 150 | 175 | 175 | 190 | 185 | 185 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| ID | 255 | 250 | 240 | 39 | 33 | 44 | 46 | 52 | 53 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| IA | 415 | 465 | 455 | 69 | 57 | 55 | 56 | 55 | 64 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| KS | 2,360 | 2,370 | 2,340 | 460 | 360 | 445 | 470 | 390 | 460 | 20 | 20 | 15 |
| NE | 2,210 | 2,320 | 2,260 | 295 | 315 | 300 | 350 | 330 | 350 | 5 | 15 | 10 |
| NM | 105 | 125 | 113 | 16 | 13 | 13 | 21 | 14 | 23 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| OK | 330 | 340 | 325 | 74 | 48 | 61 | 77 | 56 | 73 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| SD | 205 | 210 | 205 | 33 | 32 | 31 | 36 | 26 | 34 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| TX | 2,640 | 2,690 | 2,620 | 490 | 340 | 480 | 530 | 360 | 540 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| WA | 185 | 185 | 159 | 35 | 32 | 22 | 34 | 35 | 47 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Oth Sts | 300 | 320 | 310 | 46 | 46 | 42 | 54 | 53 | 50 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| US | 10,763 | 11,152 | 10,870 | 1,810 | 1,523 | 1,760 | 1,967 | 1,634 | 1,973 | 67 | 76 | 69 |
| 1/ Cattle and calves on feed are animals for slaughter market being fed a ration of grain or other concentrates and are expected to produce a carcass that will grade select or better. 2/ Includes death losses, movement from feedlots to pastures, and shipments to other feedlots for further feeding. | ||||||||||||
Return to:
Publication List
Previous Ag Update Issues